Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Norwegian Ambassador Calls for Effective Protection of South Sudan Journalists

Joseph Oduha

February 7, 2019

Journalist Mading Ngor (left) and Lard Andersen (right). Photo by: @LarsandeLars.

JUBA, South Sudan (Via News) - "We are worried about developments in South Sudan. We see journalists being persecuted, as is anybody else that criticizes the government. This does not bode well for the country's civil society – or for its peace process," states Lars Andersen, Norway's ambassador to South Sudan.

Andersen continues: "South Sudan's journalists and activities require effective protection from government-issued harassment, as this is the way to ensure freedom of the press and speech."

Andersen's remarks were made at a workshop held on February 4, 2019, in Juba. The workshop was organized by the Inter-governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) with the objective of developing the capabilities of women leaders in South Sudan.

As Andersen pointed out: "A free exchange of opinion and voicing of criticisms are elements required for the development of a society. If you stifle criticism and dissent, you won't make the best decisions for your country. And you certainly won't get a handle on corruption and other crimes," Andersen noted.

"Freedom of speech and media are key values of humankind and key indicators of a country's political health. This also applies to each organization. Each of them has to promote and protect these freedoms in its internal dealings," Anderson concluded.

Andersen's remarks were occasioned by further reports of the South Sudanese government's crackdown's causing journalists to leave their professions, or to resort to strict self-censorship.

South Sudanese journalists join call for the release of Sudanese colleagues

The journalists in South Sudan are reportedly dealing with a harsh crackdown perpetrated by the country's media authorities. Its objective is to stop reports on the unrest sweeping Sudan, the neighbor country to the north.

The authorities' fear is that the unrest could spread to South Sudan.

Harsh though this reportedly crackdown is, it pales in comparison to what our colleagues in Sudan are experiencing.

Their dire fates have led the renowned Committee to Protect Journalists organization to call upon Sudanese authorities to release the journalists detained for the "crime" of covering the widespread protests against the Bashir regime.

"President Bashir's attempt to deflect the public's anger by smearing Sudan's brave journalists is both futile and shameful," says Sheriff Mansour, the CPJ's Middle East and North Africa program coordinator.

"Rounding up more journalists won't help authorities find a solution to the country's ongoing unrest," he added.

The reportedly arrested journalists are Tariq Ali, Iman Osman, Musab Mohamed, Osama Hassan, Adam Mahdi, and Amin Sanada.

These imprisonments have reportedly been accompanied by a revocation of the credentials of journalists working for international news outlets, and by a curtailing of access to the Internet and social media.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Investment Boom Meets Market Skepticism: Palantir's Contract Win vs. Stock Slide Amid Record Private AI Funding
Palantir secured the Army's high-profile TITAN AI-sensing contract and added a new executive, yet its stock fell 6% the same day — a sign that even marquee government AI wins no longer guarantee investor confidence. This tension plays out against a backdrop of surging private capital flooding into AI and AI-adjacent companies (Stability AI, Socure, Generalist AI, Emerald AI, and others), showing a bifurcated market: venture funding for AI remains red-hot while public-market sentiment toward AI-defense/enterprise plays is growing more cautious.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
General Motors Company
Both facts reference General Motors' cash position at the identical point in time (2025-12-31), both measuring FY 2025 period-end. Fact A reports $20.945 billion while Fact B reports $21.7 billion—a $755 million discrepancy (3.6% difference). Since they share the same entity, attribute, date, and fiscal period with conflicting values, this is a genuine contradiction, not a change over time. The difference is material enough to suggest either: different source data, different cash classifications (e.g., one includes equivalents/restricted cash), preliminary vs. final figures, or a data quality issue.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,278 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com