Tuesday, September 1, 2026

AI in 2020: No Increase in Adoption But Far From Stalled

ViaNews Editorial Team

December 4, 2020

Photo by Franck V. on Unsplash

There has not been an increase in the adoption of artificial intelligence but some companies are capturing value from the frontier technology at the enterprise level and many are generating revenue and reducing costs at least at the function level, says McKinsey & Company.

According to the results of this year’s McKinsey Global Survey on AI, half of the respondents said their organizations have adopted the technology in at least one function.

The online survey was in the field from June 9 to June 19 and collected responses from 2,395 participants who represented the full range of regions, industries, company sizes, functional specialties, and tenures, the global consulting firm explained.

“While AI adoption was about equal across regions last year, this year’s respondents working for companies with headquarters in Latin American countries and other developing countries are much less likely than those elsewhere to report that their companies have embedded AI into a process or product in at least one function or business unit,” it added.

By industry, respondents in the high-tech and telecom sectors are the most likely to report AI adoption, the report said. The automotive and assembly sector, which shared the lead last year, are falling just behind them.

Read more: 9 New Automation Projects Focused on U.S. COVID-19 Recovery

The survey shows that service operations, product or service development, and marketing and sales took the top spots in terms of the business functions in which organizations adopt AI.

“Within these functions, the largest shares of respondents report revenue increases for inventory and parts optimization, pricing and promotion, customer-service analytics, and sales and demand forecasting,” McKinsey noted, adding that over two-thirds of respondents who report adopting each of those use cases say its adoption increased revenue.

Optimization of talent management, contact-center automation, and warehouse automation are the use cases that most commonly led to cost decreases, the survey revealed. “Over half of respondents who report adopting each of those say the use of AI in those areas reduced costs.”

Some companies using AI, according to McKinsey, are seeing that value accrue to the enterprise level. “A small contingent of respondents coming from a variety of industries attribute 20 percent or more of their organizations’ earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to AI. These companies plan to invest even more in AI in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its acceleration of all things digital.”

The consulting firm says this could create a wider divide between AI leaders and the majority of companies who are still struggling to invest in the technology.

Read more: What Are the Main Imperatives for Automation Success?

The companies seeing the most value from their use of AI engage in several practices and report several strengths that set them apart from other respondents, including better overall performance, better overall leadership, and resource commitment to AI. 

“The survey findings suggest that a minority of companies recognize many of the risks of AI use, and fewer are working to reduce the risks—as was true in 2019,” McKinsey wrote, adding that cybersecurity remains the only risk considered relevant by a majority of respondents.

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Hawkish Fed Signals at Jackson Hole Pressure Rate-Sensitive Assets
Kevin Warsh's hawkish inflation remarks at Jackson Hole, alongside a steady drumbeat of Federal Reserve testimony from Powell, Barr, Bowman and other officials on supervision, regulation and monetary policy, signal continued vigilance against inflation rather than an imminent easing cycle. Rate-sensitive and precious-metals-linked names such as SSR Mining sold off the same day, consistent with markets repricing for a firmer-for-longer policy stance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,979
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,979 facts checked against source5,261 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com