Saturday, October 31, 2026

Billions Transferred to Ice-cream Vendor Caused his Bank Account to be Frozen

Javaid Chattha

October 3, 2018

Indian rupees. Photo by: Monito.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (ViaNews) - The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Pakistan's security agency, froze the account of an ice-cream vendor in Karachi who reportedly received a Rs2.25 billion (Indian Rupee) transfer into his bank account. The FIA began an investigation to determine the details of the bank transfer and has also been questioning five officials of a private bank. FIA officials said there would be two separate investigations. One will be headed by a judicial committee, while the other will be conducted by the FIA. Legal experts were consulted in order to understand against whom the case should be registered under the money laundering charges, FIA officials said.

Who's the ice-cream vendor

The ice-cream vendor is Abdul Qadir, a resident of Orangi Town. He said he had no knowledge of any transfer and was totally unaware of how such a huge amount of funds were transferred into his account. Meanwhile, a police contingent has already been deployed outside of the home of the ice-cream vendor. [caption id="attachment_5326" align="aligncenter" width="900"]Abdul Qadir, ice-cream vendor from Karachi, Pakistan. Photo by: Courtesy Pakistan the News. Abdul Qadir, ice-cream vendor from Karachi, Pakistan. Photo by: Courtesy Pakistan the News.[/caption] Both the media and the officials at the helm of affairs are baffled by the whole situation. The ice-cream vendor said that he came to know about the huge transfer through a letter issued by the FIA, adding that a few years ago he had opened a bank account to buy a house in the Sarjani Town of the (Karachi) metropolis.

Politicians involved?

Sindh Minister and Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leader, Saeed Ghani, has said that the PPP was being involved in the scam of Rs 2.25 billion deposited into the bank account of an ice-cream vendor. “Instead of probing us (our party), the ice-cream vendor should be investigated,” the Sindh minister remarked. The transfer was deposited sometime during the years of 2014-2015, allegedly by a man identified as Bombat. According to officials investigating the case, It's strange and unbelievable how a simple, ordinary vendor, who earns just Rs 500 a day could own such an astonishingly large amount of money,

Categories

Tags

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
ESMO 2026 Oncology Data Wave Builds Toward Ivonescimab PDUFA, While Micro-Cap Biotech Exits the Market
Late October 2026 is a dense catalyst window led by ESMO 2026. Daiichi Sankyo's DXd antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) programs (DESTINY-Lung04, DESTINY-Breast11, REJOICE-Ovarian01/02, TUXEDO-3), Guardant's 25 abstracts and the PACE-LUNG ctDNA trial all report there. These feed into the FDA's 14 November 2026 PDUFA date for ivonescimab. Large and mid-cap developers with late-stage data and commercial launches (ZEGFROVY, ANKTIVA, MIUDELLA, lorundrostat, duvakitug) are drawing capital and attention. Spago Nanomedical's board decision to seek a Nasdaq First North delisting (EGM 19 November, application 25 January 2027) shows the capital squeeze on early-stage, single-asset names (Tumorad is Phase I).
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,994
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,994 facts checked against source5,514 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com