Monday, September 21, 2026

New E-Commerce Policy Leaves Amazon and Walmart Disadvantaged In India

Ruchi Gupta

August 20, 2018

Jeff Bezos at the Encore Awards. Photo by: Steve Jurvetson.
NEW DELHI (India) - The stage is set for one of the biggest tussle, pitying the richest man in the world, Jeff Bezos (Amazon), and India’s business tycoon and billionaire Mukeshi Ambani (Reliance Retail). It promises to be one of the fiercest battles for the Amazon co-founder who is increasingly looking to entrench Amazon’s e-commerce ambitions in India.

Amazon-Walmart India Push

For the longest time, the focus was on the kind of competition Amazon would have to contend with from Walmart-backed Flipkart Online services. However, not anymore, as a new national e-commerce policy threatens to keep the two U.S companies disadvantaged in the race to expand their footprint and influence in India’s e-commerce landscape. Amazon would be left disadvantage on the implementation of a draft e-commerce policy that states foreign-funded firms are not allowed to hold and operate e-commerce inventory in the country. The policy, if implemented to the letter, would make it impossible for the U.S e-commerce giant to capitalize on its strength on logistics operations.

Reliance Retail edge

The policy also calls stringent controls on subsidiaries and resellers that Amazon and other foreign companies have been using to get around the no-inventory policy. Amazon’s big loss will be Amani’s Reliance Retail Ltd (RIL) big win as the Indian company will be in a position to make good use of its warehouses and supply chain logistics. RIL Chairman, Ambani has already made it clear his intention to grab a bigger piece of the growing e-commerce business by expanding the current physical store infrastructure. Reliance Retail already boasts of 7,500 stores in 4,400 cities, a feat that Walmart and Amazon would struggle to compete against, especially on restrictions when it comes to inventory holding in the country. Amazon will struggle a great deal to offer the deep discounts it has offered in new markets, to fend off competition, should the new draft come into law. Reliance Retail, on the other hand, will have the edge over Amazon and Walmart by essentially leveraging its warehouses, inventory, supply chain, and nationwide reach to grab a bigger piece of the e-commerce market share.

In this story · Knowledge Files

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Frontier AI Slowdown Call Splits Industry, Rattles Capex-Sensitive Markets
Anthropic's Dario Amodei publicly called for a coordinated global slowdown in frontier AI development, a stance Microsoft echoed with a 'humanist' AI code of conduct, but Nvidia and Meta's CEOs rejected any coordinated pause days later, exposing a widening rift between safety-focused and growth-focused AI leaders. The dispute landed amid growing financial scrutiny of AI infrastructure spending — a hyperscaler capex analysis, FTC warnings against antitrust waivers for AI firms, and an 8.6% single-day stock drop in GE Vernova tied directly to the slowdown remarks — signaling investors are newly nervous about whether the AI capex boom (including Alphabet's projected $701B revenue narrative) can be justified if the pace of development itself becomes contested.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,983
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,304 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com