Neubranding Scholar Advises on How Companies Can Capture the Minds of Customers

Via News Video

December 7, 2023

Omid Asgari, CEO of DCG Lab, talks with us about the two sides of his passion, Neurobranding, establishment of DCG, his journey, helping key decision makers, critical problem solving, getting into the mind of customers, understanding who we are, big and small data used in his company, involving startups, entrepreneurship, answering the why question and much more.

https://youtu.be/N5NWW1E803o?si=aE6RX1JIZFoFW8J4

Interview by Miguel Salvado.

Via News Video

Video content and multimedia coverage from Via News, bringing you visual insights into markets, business, and finance.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page

Live from the substrate

What we're seeing

AI Capital Surge: Late-August 2026 Funding Wave Spans Fintech, Enterprise Agents, and Robotics

A dense cluster of funding rounds landing on 2026-08-28 — from identity/fraud fintech player Socure ($156M plus its acquisition of Fravity) to enterprise AI agent startups (Instinct, Generalist AI, Owner), model infrastructure (Stability AI, Emerald AI), and autonomous logistics/aerospace (Gatik, Regent Craft) — signals investors are rotating aggressively into AI-native companies with demonstrable ROI, especially in financial risk/compliance and back-office automation. Parallel signals (Multiverse Computing's compression benchmarks cutting inference cost/latency, and Arkestro/CloneOps.ai publishing hard savings and labor-displacement figures) suggest the funding is chasing efficiency and measurable economic impact rather than pure model scale.

Our read on the data ›

Signals we're tracking

Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration

Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases

Patterns we're watching ›

Where sources disagree

ING Group

Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.

We flag conflicts openly ›

Recently verified

✓ Checked against the original source

4,980

facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.

101 entities tracked4,980 facts checked against source5,267 source documents archived

Query this data → isubstrate.com

Neubranding Scholar Advises on How Companies Can Capture the Minds of Customers

Categories

Tags