AI's Short-Term Economic Impact By Prof. Ramesh Srinivasan

March 1, 2024

Ramesh Srinivasan, Professor & Author at ULCA, talks about his experience at the Web Summit, technologies being good for businesses, the future of AI, relevance of their personal data, identifying jobs of the future through AI, future of work, collapse of technologies, asking 3 main questions, entrepreneurship in Africa, advantages of having great policies, the future of AI, what it means to be a human?, overcoming challenges through technologies, predicting climate change through AI, next step for governments, and much more!

Watch the full interview here!

https://youtu.be/nqLypNYQnJo

Via News Video

Video content and multimedia coverage from Via News, bringing you visual insights into markets, business, and finance.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page

Live from the substrate

What we're seeing

Agentic Enterprise Software Consolidates: Big Platforms Push Autonomy While Startups Get Absorbed

Enterprise software is shifting toward autonomous, AI-agent-driven products. SAP (Autonomous Enterprise, Joule), Meta (a new Enterprise Platform led by ex-MongoDB CEO Chirantan Desai) and UiPath (raised guidance) are pushing from the top. Meanwhile AI-security and governance startups are being acquired (Fortinet–Virtue AI, Harvey–Guardrails AI, Tiny–Oso Cloud) and seed-stage agent companies keep raising capital (Dextr, Latitude, Groq). Investors such as Norwest's Sean Jacobsohn see finance and ERP back-office software as the easier area to disrupt. Trust and enforced governance are treated as preconditions for regulated sectors like finance, and AI is judged unreliable for calculations.

Our read on the data ›

Signals we're tracking

EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade

High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.

Patterns we're watching ›

Where sources disagree

ING Group

Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.

We flag conflicts openly ›

Recently verified

✓ Checked against the original source

4,986

facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.

101 entities tracked4,986 facts checked against source5,365 source documents archived

Query this data → isubstrate.com

AI's Short-Term Economic Impact By Prof. Ramesh Srinivasan

Categories

Tags