Monday, October 26, 2026

Global Support Activities for Mining Industry: Should Investors Hope for Better Returns?

How the industry looks like currently

Ruchi Gupta

September 12, 2020

Open pit mining, carbon, brown coal, industry. Image with Public Domain Certification.

The Global Support Activities for Mining Industry is integral to the optimal functioning of the global economy. The industry engages in activities that facilitate the operation of mining companies. The industry gets divided into three markets: support activities for the metal mining sector, the non-metallic mining sector, and the coal mining sector. Therefore, the industry has many moving parts and a sectoral analysis may bring out different results from the broad industry.

In some sense, the support activities for the mining industry are a subcategory of the mining industry. This means the state of the global mining industry determines the state of the support activities sector.

In the decade after the Great Recession, the Global Support Activities for Mining Industry has been expanding on the back of favorable conditions in the broad mining industry. 

Many companies that operate in the support activities sector of the mining industry offer their services on a contractual basis. While some companies offer financial support, others offer mining equipment.

Interestingly, the global mining equipment market is growing fast in value. In 2017, the market was worth $106.9 billion. With a CAGR of more than 7.2%, the market was worth approximately $122.31 billion at the end of 2019. Most of the mining equipment comes from companies like Komatsu, Caterpillar, and Liebherr-International AG.

2019 was a good year for mining companies. The top 40 mining companies in the world recorded an 8% jump in revenue to $683 billion, according to figures by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). PwC showed that capital expenditure by mining companies increased by 12% to $57 billion, the first such increase in five years. Also, the production of minerals (metals, nonmetals, and coal) was at 17.2 billion metric tons, according to the World Mining Congress data.

Countries where support activities for the mining industry flourish

Oftentimes, the Support Activities for the Mining Industry sector are robust in countries with a strong mining industry. The United States is one of these countries. In 2018, the output from US mines amounted to $82.2 billion in value. Comparatively, it was 3% higher than the total output for the previous year, according to the US Geological Survey’s Mineral Commodities Summaries.

Interestingly, the support activities for mining in the US ebbs and flows in accord with the mining industry. The support activities for mining experience higher gross operating surplus during the years when the mining industry is doing well.

As the chart below shows, the operating surplus was low between 2008 and 2011. During this period, the global economy was in turmoil, and industries, among them mining, were underperforming.

Gross operating surplus of support activities for mining in the United States from 1998 to 2016. Source: Statista

The other country where the support activities for mining are robust is Australia. As of 2019, the sector had achieved a market value of over AUD 10 billion. There were 1,823 businesses providing support services like mineral exploration. Over 41,000 Australians worked in the industry.

Best performing sectors

The best performing sectors in this industry include equipment selling and maintenance, mineral exploration, and oil and gas mining.

Halliburton, for example, is a multinational company that participates in support activities for oil and gas mining. The company has more than 55,000 people on its payroll spread across 140 countries. Specifically, Halliburton facilitates hydrocarbon exploration and management of geological data.

Other companies like CIMIC Group Limited offer a range of services targeted at mining companies. CIMIC Group develops mining equipment that is in use all over the world. The company offers maintenance services for the equipment.

Short-term and long-term expectations

In the short-term, the industry is facing various challenges. They include a slowdown in the economic growth of China, which is also the largest importer of minerals and other raw materials from mines. This disappointment will get worse as China and the world continue to grapple with the coronavirus epidemic. Secondly, increased global tensions are weighing on the growth of the global economy. As such, the demand for minerals and raw materials remains low.

The long-term outlook is rosy. Particularly, copper and metal prices will stabilize in the long-term while growth is expected to will pick up. Furthermore, China has plans in motion to spur economic growth and the resulting demand for minerals should fuel demand for supporting activities.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Q4 2026 Biotech Catalyst Window: ESMO Data, the Ivonescimab PDUFA and Small-Cap Delistings
Mid-October to November 2026 is a dense catalyst period for clinical-stage biotech. Positive late-stage readouts (ALOFT-IPF, TELIGAN, MIUDELLA, the duvakitug extension) and the ESMO 2026 presentations lead up to the FDA's 14 November PDUFA date for the ivonescimab BLA. At the opposite end of the market, Spago Nanomedical is moving to delist from Nasdaq First North, which shows how hard it is for micro-cap developers to fund themselves. Value is concentrating in companies with late-stage data and near-term regulatory outcomes.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,994
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,994 facts checked against source5,500 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com