Sunday, September 20, 2026

Cliffs Natural Resources Stock Rises By 30% In The Last 21 Sessions

ViaNews Editorial Team

February 2, 2023

Cliffs Natural Resources Stock Rises By 30% In The Last 21 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - Shares of Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE: CLF) jumped by a staggering 30.61% in 21 sessions from $16.79 to $21.93 at 11:22 EST on Thursday, after two sequential sessions in a row of gains. NYSE is jumping 0.35% to $16,178.17, after two consecutive sessions in a row of gains.

Cliffs Natural Resources's last close was $21.89, 35.69% below its 52-week high of $34.04.

About Cliffs Natural Resources

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. operates as a flat-rolled steel producer in North America. The company offers carbon steel products, such as hot-rolled, cold-rolled, electrogalvanized, hot-dip galvanized, hot-dip galvannealed, aluminized, enameling, and advanced high-strength steel products; stainless steel products; plates; and grain oriented and non-oriented electrical steel products. It also provides tubular components, including carbon steel, stainless steel, and electric resistance welded tubing. In addition, the company offers tinplate products, such as electrolytic tin coated and chrome coated sheet, and tin mill products; tooling and sampling; raw materials; ingots, rolled blooms, and cast blooms; and hot-briquetted iron products. Further, it owns five iron ore mines in Minnesota and Michigan. The company serves automotive, infrastructure and manufacturing, distributors and converters, and steel producers. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. was formerly known as Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and changed its name to Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. in August 2017. The company was founded in 1847 and is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Earnings Per Share

As for profitability, Cliffs Natural Resources has a trailing twelve months EPS of $-0.07.

The company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is 42.85%.

Growth Estimates Quarters

The company's growth estimates for the present quarter and the next is a negative 111.2% and a negative 98%, respectively.

Volume

Today's last reported volume for Cliffs Natural Resources is 3219045 which is 75.32% below its average volume of 12034800.

More news about Cliffs Natural Resources (CLF).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Boom Hits a Fork: Slowdown Calls Clash with Capex Confidence as Markets Get Nervous
Dario Amodei's repeated calls for a global slowdown in frontier AI development, echoed by Microsoft's new humanist AI code of conduct and FTC antitrust caution, are being publicly rejected by Nvidia and Meta leadership even as hyperscaler spending draws fresh skeptical scrutiny (Wachter's analysis, Burry-style overbuilding worries) and weak guidance from Adobe and a post-slowdown-comment selloff in GE Vernova signal investor jitters. Meanwhile wealth and security effects of the AI race keep compounding — Zhang Yiming's fortune surging on AI-driven ByteDance value, a Chinese hacking firm weaponizing AI against stolen government secrets, and low-quality AI-generated products (an AI sitcom, a spam-flooding agent platform) fueling backlash even as adoption races ahead.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Berkshire Hathaway
Both facts report Berkshire Hathaway's cash position on 2026-01-01 with identical observation timestamps, but claim vastly different values: 380 billion USD vs 400 USD. These cannot both be true for the same entity at the same point in time. The magnitude of the discrepancy (a factor of ~10^9) rules out rounding, unit conversion, or methodological differences.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,982
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,982 facts checked against source5,299 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com