Thursday, October 15, 2026

Nano Dimension Stock Went Down By Over 15% In The Last 5 Sessions

Nano Dimension Stock Went Down By Over 15% In The Last 5 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - Shares of Nano Dimension (NASDAQ: NNDM) dropped by a staggering 15.13% in 5 sessions from $3.05 at -15.13, to $2.59 at 14:59 EST on Tuesday, after three sequential sessions in a row of losses. NASDAQ is rising 1.13% to $11,315.40, following the last session's upward trend.

Nano Dimension's last close was $2.72, 31.66% under its 52-week high of $3.98.

About Nano Dimension

Nano Dimension Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides additive electronics in Israel and internationally. The company's flagship product is DragonFly IV system that serves cross-industry High-Performance-Electronic-Devices' fabrication needs by depositing proprietary conductive and dielectric substances, as well as integrates in-situ capacitors, antennas, coils, transformers, and electromechanical components. It also provides nanotechnology based conductive and dielectric inks; and FLIGHT software platform that enables the 3D design of electrical and mechanical features. The company markets and sells products and services to companies that develop products with electronic components, including companies in the defense, automotive, consumer electronics, semiconductor, aerospace, and medical industries, as well as research institutes. Nano Dimension Ltd. was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Ness Ziona, Israel.

Earnings Per Share

As for profitability, Nano Dimension has a trailing twelve months EPS of $-1.129.

The company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is negative -22.01%.

Revenue Growth

Year-on-year quarterly revenue growth grew by 646.1%, now sitting on 39.06M for the twelve trailing months.

Moving Average

Nano Dimension's value is below its 50-day moving average of $2.70 and under its 200-day moving average of $2.77.

Volatility

Nano Dimension's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was a negative 5.92%, a positive 0.36%, and a positive 2.54%.

Nano Dimension's highest amplitude of average volatility was 6.91% (last week), 3.38% (last month), and 2.54% (last quarter).

More news about Nano Dimension (NNDM).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Q4 2026 Biopharma Catalyst Cluster: Late-Stage Readouts and Regulatory Milestones
October 2026 brings a dense run of Phase 3 wins (ALOFT-IPF, RESTORE-3), new data presentations (Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Vertex, Galderma) and regulatory steps (FDA acceptance of Roche's vamikibart BLA, Scholar Rock's EMA resubmission). The next big catalyst is the ivonescimab FDA PDUFA date on 2026-11-14. Obesity combination studies (REDEFINE 4, TOGETHER-PsO) and the 2027 Maritime-1 completion point to more catalysts ahead. QAIAx's speculative AI-linked trial claims (the QIII pilot, targeted for 2027) are an unrelated micro-cap sideshow with weak evidence, and have little in common with the large-cap pipeline news.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,986
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,986 facts checked against source5,377 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com