Monday, November 2, 2026

NASDAQ 100 Went Down By Over 3% In The Last 5 Sessions

ViaNews Editorial Team

January 4, 2024

NASDAQ 100 Went Down By Over 3% In The Last 5 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - NASDAQ 100 (NDX) has been up by 3.34% for the last 5 sessions. At 10:08 EST on Thursday, 4 January, NASDAQ 100 (NDX) is $16,342.31.

Volume

Today's last reported volume for NASDAQ 100 is 148366281, 93.98% below its average volume of 2465450498.29.

Concerning NASDAQ 100's yearly highs and lows, it's 52.78% up from its 52-week low and 3.69% down from its 52-week high.

Volatility

NASDAQ 100's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was a negative 1.07%, a positive 0.16%, and a positive 0.79%, respectively.

NASDAQ 100's highest amplitude of average volatility was 1.07% (last week), 0.72% (last month), and 0.79% (last quarter), respectively.

Index Price Classification

According to the stochastic oscillator, a useful indicator of overbought and oversold conditions, NASDAQ 100's is considered to be overbought (>=80).

News about

  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "The Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P 500 gained 9.5%, 8.9% and 7.2%, respectively, in the half-year ended on Dec 31, 2023.", "The Nasdaq Composite, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 gained 5.5%, 4.8% and 4.4%, respectively, in December 2023. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "Shares of the company have gained 56.7% over a year, outperforming the S&P 500 index's rally of 25.2%."
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "While the 30-stock Dow climbed to record highs, the broader S&P 500 hovered near its all-time high and posted a whopping gain of 24% for the year. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "Against this backdrop, below we highlight a few dividend ETFs that have beaten the S&P 500 (up 24.2%) this year.", "The fund invests in dividend-paying U.S. stocks paired with an S&P 500 index-based option overlay for additional income. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "View all Key Company Metrics for Constellation Brands here>>>Shares of Constellation Brands have demonstrated returns of -0.1% over the past month compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +5% change. "

More news about NASDAQ 100 (NDX).

In this story · Knowledge Files

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Agentic AI Goes Operational: Platform Governance, Local Silicon, and the Physical-AI Data Race
In mid-to-late October 2026, enterprise vendors (Cisco, Fortinet, ServiceNow, Intuit, Salesforce/Braze, Adobe) shipped agent governance, AI security and AI-driven customer engagement products, while a parallel hardware wave (NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops, ASUS, Apple's iPad mini, Microsoft's hybrid local/cloud Windows) pushed AI onto local devices. A third strand, physical AI (Encord, Harvest Praxis, Hesai), argues that real-world sensor data and cheaper edge chips are the next bottleneck. The common thread is the shift from AI experimentation to governed, scaled deployment, with Salesforce's Braze acquisition showing consolidation and fintech players like Intuit tying AI to trusted financial data. The facts support a broad industry theme but contain little direct finance or regulatory evidence, so the AI-finance angle is thin.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,532 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com