Tuesday, September 1, 2026

NASDAQ 100 Went Down By Over 3% In The Last 5 Sessions

ViaNews Editorial Team

January 4, 2024

NASDAQ 100 Went Down By Over 3% In The Last 5 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - NASDAQ 100 (NDX) has been up by 3.34% for the last 5 sessions. At 10:08 EST on Thursday, 4 January, NASDAQ 100 (NDX) is $16,342.31.

Volume

Today's last reported volume for NASDAQ 100 is 148366281, 93.98% below its average volume of 2465450498.29.

Concerning NASDAQ 100's yearly highs and lows, it's 52.78% up from its 52-week low and 3.69% down from its 52-week high.

Volatility

NASDAQ 100's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was a negative 1.07%, a positive 0.16%, and a positive 0.79%, respectively.

NASDAQ 100's highest amplitude of average volatility was 1.07% (last week), 0.72% (last month), and 0.79% (last quarter), respectively.

Index Price Classification

According to the stochastic oscillator, a useful indicator of overbought and oversold conditions, NASDAQ 100's is considered to be overbought (>=80).

News about

  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "The Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P 500 gained 9.5%, 8.9% and 7.2%, respectively, in the half-year ended on Dec 31, 2023.", "The Nasdaq Composite, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 gained 5.5%, 4.8% and 4.4%, respectively, in December 2023. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "Shares of the company have gained 56.7% over a year, outperforming the S&P 500 index's rally of 25.2%."
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "While the 30-stock Dow climbed to record highs, the broader S&P 500 hovered near its all-time high and posted a whopping gain of 24% for the year. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "Against this backdrop, below we highlight a few dividend ETFs that have beaten the S&P 500 (up 24.2%) this year.", "The fund invests in dividend-paying U.S. stocks paired with an S&P 500 index-based option overlay for additional income. "
  • According to Zacks on Tuesday, 2 January, "View all Key Company Metrics for Constellation Brands here>>>Shares of Constellation Brands have demonstrated returns of -0.1% over the past month compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +5% change. "

More news about NASDAQ 100 (NDX).

In this story · Knowledge Files

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge: Late-August 2026 Funding Wave Spans Fintech, Enterprise Agents, and Robotics
A dense cluster of funding rounds landing on 2026-08-28 — from identity/fraud fintech player Socure ($156M plus its acquisition of Fravity) to enterprise AI agent startups (Instinct, Generalist AI, Owner), model infrastructure (Stability AI, Emerald AI), and autonomous logistics/aerospace (Gatik, Regent Craft) — signals investors are rotating aggressively into AI-native companies with demonstrable ROI, especially in financial risk/compliance and back-office automation. Parallel signals (Multiverse Computing's compression benchmarks cutting inference cost/latency, and Arkestro/CloneOps.ai publishing hard savings and labor-displacement figures) suggest the funding is chasing efficiency and measurable economic impact rather than pure model scale.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,980
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,980 facts checked against source5,267 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com