Sunday, September 13, 2026

Nikkei 225 Bullish By 6% In The Last 21 Sessions

Nikkei 225 Bullish By 6% In The Last 21 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - Nikkei 225 (N225) has been up by 6.9% for the last 21 sessions. At 21:08 EST on Thursday, 29 June, Nikkei 225 (N225) is $33,018.96.

About Nikkei 225's yearly highs and lows, it's 28.87% up from its 52-week low and 2.23% down from its 52-week high.

Volatility

Nikkei 225's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was 0.43%, 0.28%, and 0.78%, respectively.

Nikkei 225's highest amplitude of average volatility was 0.92% (last week), 1.07% (last month), and 0.78% (last quarter), respectively.

Index Price Classification

According to the stochastic oscillator, a useful indicator of overbought and oversold conditions, Nikkei 225's is considered to be oversold (<=20).

News about

  • According to Zacks on Wednesday, 28 June, "The S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index equally weights stocks in the materials sector of the S&P 500 Index.", "Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Materials ETFs segment of the market. "
  • According to Zacks on Wednesday, 28 June, "A smart beta exchange traded fund, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS Quick QuoteRSPS - Free Report) debuted on 11/01/2006, and offers broad exposure to the Consumer Staples ETFs category of the market.", "The S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index equally weights stocks in the consumer staples sector of the S&P 500 Index."
  • According to Zacks on Wednesday, 28 June, "The S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index equally weights stocks in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500 Index.", "RSPD seeks to match the performance of the S&P 500 EQL WEIGHT CONS DISCRETIONARY ID before fees and expenses."
  • According to DailyForex on Wednesday, 28 June, "Accordingly, the shares of the giant technology companies led the stocks recovery, with the Nasdaq 100 index rising by nearly 2 percent, and the S&P 500 index halting its decline for two days. ", "In the year since two of those negative streaks, the S&P 500 has gained 10.9 percent and 19 percent, respectively - and after a record 18 months, the stock barometer has climbed even more.XAU/USD gold price forecast today:The current bears are trying to control the performance of the gold price, XAU/USD, in going aggressively to breach the psychological support at $1900."

More news about Nikkei 225 (N225).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Keeps Flowing as Enterprise Adoption and Government Contracts Validate the Bet
A late-August surge of nine-figure funding rounds (Socure, Stability AI, Generalist AI, Gatik, Regent Craft, Emerald AI, Owner) shows venture capital still pouring into AI infrastructure, identity/fintech, and autonomy, even as public-market sentiment stays jumpy — Palantir's stock fell 6% the same week it landed the Army's TITAN contract. UiPath's raised guidance and strong Q2 results, alongside efficiency breakthroughs like Multiverse Computing's model compression, point to real enterprise monetization catching up to the funding hype.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Both facts record the same attribute (net_income) for JPMorgan Chase & Co. in the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31), but report values that differ by approximately 1 billion times: $16,494,000,000 vs $16.49. These cannot both be true simultaneously. The discrepancy suggests either a unit mismatch (e.g., one is total net income, the other earnings per share mislabeled as net_income), a decimal point error, or data entry corruption. For the same entity, attribute, and time period, only one value can be correct.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,280 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com