Saturday, September 5, 2026

CBOE Volatility Index Went Down By Over 33% In The Last 30 Days

CBOE Volatility Index Went Down By Over 33% In The Last 30 Days

CBOE Volatility Index is currently on bearish momentum. At 14:15 EST on Friday, 9 April, CBOE Volatility Index is at 16.83, 33.63% down since the last session's close.

CBOE Volatility Index Range

Concerning CBOE Volatility Index's daily highs and lows, it's 1.69% up from its trailing 30 days low of $16.55 and 29.49% down from its trailing 30 days high of $23.87.

Regarding CBOE Volatility Index's yearly highs and lows, it's 3.89% up from its 52-week low and 64.77% down from its 52-week high.

Volatility

CBOE Volatility Index's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current volatility was a negative 0.48%, a negative 0.87%, and a positive 7.82%, respectively.

CBOE Volatility Index's current volatility rank, which measures how volatile a financial asset is (variation between the lowest and highest value in a period), was 5.46% (last week), 6.18% (last month), and 7.82% (last quarter), respectively.

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge Meets Investor Caution: Record Funding Rounds and Government Contracts Amid Valuation Skepticism
A single-week cluster of large AI/fintech funding rounds (Socure, Stability AI, Emerald AI, Generalist AI, Instinct, Gatik, Regent Craft) shows venture capital still pouring into AI infrastructure, identity, and autonomy plays, while Palantir's Army TITAN contract win coincided with a 6% stock drop — signaling that even flagship AI-defense revenue isn't immune to market reassessment of AI valuations. Efficiency-focused innovations like Multiverse Computing's model compression suggest the sector is also pivoting toward cost/inference economics as capital intensity draws scrutiny.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
The same metric (eps) for the same entity (Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC) reported for the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31) has two conflicting values: 3.43 USD_per_share vs 3.08 USD. This is not a temporal change — both observations claim to measure the same point in time. The ~10% discrepancy (0.35 USD difference) is material for a financial metric.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,273 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com