Sunday, November 15, 2026

Very First UN Summit for Chiefs of Police From all Over World

The first-ever UN Chiefs of Police Summit convened 113 police leaders at UN headquarters in New York on June 3, 2016. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon opened the event focused on global threats including organized crime, extremism, and sexual exploitation in peacekeeping.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

June 3, 2016

Written by the Via News newsroom. From our archive, published before source-traceability. How we work

UN-cops Summit 2016.
It was the first time the UN Chiefs of Police gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York. It all started back in February when the United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, invited all the UN Chiefs of Police for the June UN-Police Summit.
"I urge all Member States to invest in UN Police and to send the head of their national police to participate in the UN Chiefs of Police Summit, in June, here in New York. This important forum provides a unique opportunity to promote the links between UN policing and national police services and to learn from different policing approaches."

Ban Ki-moon (17 February 2016)

On June 3, 2016, Ban Ki-moon inaugurated the event and took a group photo with the 113 Chiefs of Police at the UN General Assembly Hall. The summit had the presence of several international experts such as Mr. Jan Eliasson (Deputy Secretary-General), Mr. Hervé Ladsous (Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations), Mr. Yuri Fedotov (Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) and Mr. Jürgen Stock (Secretary-General of INTERPOL). Talks topics were about the emerging global threats affecting UN peace operations, including organized crime, violence, extremism, corruption, and sexual exploitation. According to the UN Cops Summit program, the meeting key outcomes aim at reinforcing strategic partnerships, evaluate operational requirements for the Leaders’ Summit on Peacekeeping (to be held in London in September 2016), and concrete follow-up actions and initiatives on UN policing. The summit conclusions should be available in the next Secretary-General’s UN Police report by the end of 2016.

Are you or your business in this article?

If something is wrong, out of context or missing, tell us. We correct errors with a dated note, and people named in an article can publish their response under it.

Correct, add context or respond →
LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist: he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor, the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Late-2026 Biotech Catalyst Season: FDA Decisions and Pivotal Readouts Converge Across Oncology, Hepatology and Cardiometabolic
Mid-November 2026 is dense with scheduled biotech catalysts. The ivonescimab BLA PDUFA date is 2026-11-14, the lorundrostat PDUFA date is 2026-12-22, and Phase 3 ECLIPSE hepatitis delta data are due in Q1 2027. Alongside these, siRNA and antibody programs (plozasiran, elebsiran/tobevibart, ianalumab, nipocalimab) reported or presented data at AHA, AASLD, ACR and ASH, while Oryzon advanced iadademstat in AML with Spanish trial authorizations and a planned ALICE-3 Phase III. Late-stage data and regulatory milestones are driving the sentiment. A planned delisting (EGM 2026-11-19, application 2027-01-25) is a separate corporate-structure event with no clear link to the rest.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,580 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com