Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Phone Fraud Criminals may be Using Information Found on Social Media Profiles to Answer Your Security Questions

Pindrop research found 61% of consumers share answers to security questions on social media, exposing them to phone fraud. Founder Vijay Balasubramaniyan presented findings at MoneyConf.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

June 7, 2017

MoneyConf 2017 - Madrid
Have you ever answered any security questions over the phone when calling your bank? According to a study by Pindrop, a voice security and authentication company, 61% of consumers admit sharing answers to security questions on social media profiles. Security questions serve the purpose of adding an extra layer of security, which may become compromised when you share sensitive information over social media websites. This Tuesday the founder of Pindrop, Vijay Balasubramaniyan, spoke at MoneyConf in Madrid explaining what banks could do better to protect their customers as call center fraud continues to rise. Vijay warns that consumers are exposing themselves to the growing risk of phone fraud as criminals can use information found on social media profiles to answer weak security questions. Banks' contact centers pose questions to confirm the person's identity, but criminals may be targeting social media accounts to find the answers to those questions. The research highlights the security flaws and the need to improve security on the phone channel, a channel that has long been neglected.
LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Network, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Frontier AI Slowdown Call Splits Industry, Rattles Capex-Sensitive Markets
Anthropic's Dario Amodei publicly called for a coordinated global slowdown in frontier AI development, a stance Microsoft echoed with a 'humanist' AI code of conduct, but Nvidia and Meta's CEOs rejected any coordinated pause days later, exposing a widening rift between safety-focused and growth-focused AI leaders. The dispute landed amid growing financial scrutiny of AI infrastructure spending — a hyperscaler capex analysis, FTC warnings against antitrust waivers for AI firms, and an 8.6% single-day stock drop in GE Vernova tied directly to the slowdown remarks — signaling investors are newly nervous about whether the AI capex boom (including Alphabet's projected $701B revenue narrative) can be justified if the pace of development itself becomes contested.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Berkshire Hathaway
Both facts report Berkshire Hathaway's cash position on 2026-01-01 with identical observation timestamps, but claim vastly different values: 380 billion USD vs 400 USD. These cannot both be true for the same entity at the same point in time. The magnitude of the discrepancy (a factor of ~10^9) rules out rounding, unit conversion, or methodological differences.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,983
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,304 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com