Monday, November 2, 2026

Phone Fraud Criminals may be Using Information Found on Social Media Profiles to Answer Your Security Questions

Pindrop research found 61% of consumers share answers to security questions on social media, exposing them to phone fraud. Founder Vijay Balasubramaniyan presented findings at MoneyConf.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

June 7, 2017

MoneyConf 2017 - Madrid
Have you ever answered any security questions over the phone when calling your bank? According to a study by Pindrop, a voice security and authentication company, 61% of consumers admit sharing answers to security questions on social media profiles. Security questions serve the purpose of adding an extra layer of security, which may become compromised when you share sensitive information over social media websites. This Tuesday the founder of Pindrop, Vijay Balasubramaniyan, spoke at MoneyConf in Madrid explaining what banks could do better to protect their customers as call center fraud continues to rise. Vijay warns that consumers are exposing themselves to the growing risk of phone fraud as criminals can use information found on social media profiles to answer weak security questions. Banks' contact centers pose questions to confirm the person's identity, but criminals may be targeting social media accounts to find the answers to those questions. The research highlights the security flaws and the need to improve security on the phone channel, a channel that has long been neglected.
LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Agentic AI Goes Operational: Platform Governance, Local Silicon, and the Physical-AI Data Race
In mid-to-late October 2026, enterprise vendors (Cisco, Fortinet, ServiceNow, Intuit, Salesforce/Braze, Adobe) shipped agent governance, AI security and AI-driven customer engagement products, while a parallel hardware wave (NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops, ASUS, Apple's iPad mini, Microsoft's hybrid local/cloud Windows) pushed AI onto local devices. A third strand, physical AI (Encord, Harvest Praxis, Hesai), argues that real-world sensor data and cheaper edge chips are the next bottleneck. The common thread is the shift from AI experimentation to governed, scaled deployment, with Salesforce's Braze acquisition showing consolidation and fintech players like Intuit tying AI to trusted financial data. The facts support a broad industry theme but contain little direct finance or regulatory evidence, so the AI-finance angle is thin.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,532 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com