Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source

Source document· December 2, 2025

Form 8.3

View original at finance.yahoo.com

Form 8.3 LONDON, December 02, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- FORM 8.3 PUBLIC OPENING POSITION DISCLOSURE/DEALING DISCLOSURE BY A PERSON WITH INTERESTS IN RELEVANT SECURITIES REPRESENTING 1% OR MORE Rule 8.3 of the Takeover Code (the "Code") 1.KEY INFORMATION (a)Full name of discloser: Park West Asset Management LLC, investmen…

Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we know · the intelligence behind this page

Live from the substrate

What we're seeing

Frontier AI Slowdown Call Splits Industry, Rattles Capex-Sensitive Markets

Anthropic's Dario Amodei publicly called for a coordinated global slowdown in frontier AI development, a stance Microsoft echoed with a 'humanist' AI code of conduct, but Nvidia and Meta's CEOs rejected any coordinated pause days later, exposing a widening rift between safety-focused and growth-focused AI leaders. The dispute landed amid growing financial scrutiny of AI infrastructure spending — a hyperscaler capex analysis, FTC warnings against antitrust waivers for AI firms, and an 8.6% single-day stock drop in GE Vernova tied directly to the slowdown remarks — signaling investors are newly nervous about whether the AI capex boom (including Alphabet's projected $701B revenue narrative) can be justified if the pace of development itself becomes contested.

Our read on the data ›

Signals we're tracking

Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration

Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases

Patterns we're watching ›

Where sources disagree

ING Group

Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.

We flag conflicts openly ›

Recently verified

✓ Checked against the original source

4,983

facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.

101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,304 source documents archived

Query this data → isubstrate.com