Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· March 3, 2026

Grupo Supervielle outlines 25%-30% loan growth target for 2026 as margins recover and capital strengthens

View original at seekingalpha.com
Grupo Supervielle outlines 25%-30% loan growth target for 2026 as margins recover and capital strengthens Earnings Call Insights: Grupo Supervielle S.A…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • Cost of risk projected between 6% and 6.5% for 2026

    80% confidence
  • We reported an attributable net loss of nearly CLP 20 billion in the fourth quarter, improving materially from the CLP 55 billion loss in the prior quarter. November marked a turning point with declining rates supporting better margins towards year-end.

    80% confidence
  • Year-end CET1 ratio projected between 11% and 13% for 2026

    80% confidence
  • Real loan growth expected at 25% to 30% in 2026, led by corporate lending

    80% confidence
  • Net fee income expected to grow about 5% in real terms for 2026

    80% confidence
  • Margin recovery and strict cost control despite elevated cost of risk led to improved loss

    80% confidence
  • NPL ratio expected to range between 5% and 6% for 2026, temporarily peaking in Q1 2026

    80% confidence
  • We believe Supervielle is well positioned to participate in that expansion

    80% confidence
  • Total loans grew 8% sequentially and 37% year-over-year, driven by corporates now representing 63% of the portfolio

    80% confidence
  • More than 70% of transactions are digital, reinforcing both engagement and operating efficiency

    80% confidence
  • No dividends will be paid in 2026 due to the 2025 loss

    80% confidence
  • In the fourth quarter, we delivered results within our guidance range and positioned the balance sheet for industry recovery. The period was marked by elevated system-wide credit stress, which we were not immune to. However, in several key areas, we outperformed the industry.

    80% confidence
  • Client net financial income increased 21% sequentially, driven by lower funding costs combined with higher loan volumes and yields

    80% confidence
  • NIM expected to be between 14% and 16% in 2026

    80% confidence
  • We can expect sequential improvements throughout 2026...our ROE basically to move into double digits by the end of 2026

    80% confidence
  • The capital level will be set by reinvestment of utilities for profit and the loan growth that we now foresee between 25% and 30% in real terms for the year

    80% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Frontier AI Slowdown Call Splits Industry, Rattles Capex-Sensitive Markets
Anthropic's Dario Amodei publicly called for a coordinated global slowdown in frontier AI development, a stance Microsoft echoed with a 'humanist' AI code of conduct, but Nvidia and Meta's CEOs rejected any coordinated pause days later, exposing a widening rift between safety-focused and growth-focused AI leaders. The dispute landed amid growing financial scrutiny of AI infrastructure spending — a hyperscaler capex analysis, FTC warnings against antitrust waivers for AI firms, and an 8.6% single-day stock drop in GE Vernova tied directly to the slowdown remarks — signaling investors are newly nervous about whether the AI capex boom (including Alphabet's projected $701B revenue narrative) can be justified if the pace of development itself becomes contested.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,983
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,304 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com