Monday, August 31, 2026

Canadian Crypto Miner DMG Abandons Bitcoin Targets, Shifts 85MW Facility to AI Infrastructure

DMG Blockchain Solutions withdrew its Bitcoin mining targets December 4, 2025, redirecting its 85-megawatt Christina Lake facility in British Columbia to AI data center operations. The pivot follows North American competitors Core Scientific and Hut 8, capitalizing on existing power infrastructure worth $800-$1,200 per kilowatt to build new.

ViaNews Editorial Team

February 23, 2026

Canadian Crypto Miner DMG Abandons Bitcoin Targets, Shifts 85MW Facility to AI Infrastructure
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.

DMG Blockchain Solutions withdrew its Bitcoin mining hashrate targets December 4, 2025, converting its 85-megawatt Christina Lake facility in British Columbia to AI data center infrastructure. The Canadian miner joins a North American trend of crypto operations pivoting to machine learning workloads amid volatile Bitcoin revenue.

CEO Sheldon Bennett cited "stronger margin profiles" in AI contracts compared to cryptocurrency mining. DMG acquired a 150MW Boardman, Oregon site in November 2025 for $12.3 million, targeting hyperscaler clients requiring industrial-scale power and cooling systems.

The shift mirrors moves by US competitors Core Scientific and Hut 8, which converted mining capacity to AI hosting in 2024-2025. Core Scientific signed a $3.5 billion contract with CoreWeave in January 2025 for 200MW of AI compute from repurposed infrastructure. Globally, data centers consume 1-1.3% of worldwide electricity demand, with AI workloads driving expansion in power-rich regions like Canada and Scandinavia.

DMG appointed Manish Z. Kshatriya, former Equinix VP of data center operations, and infrastructure finance specialist Sam Walding as directors in November and December 2025. Director Tom Panoulias resigned December 2025 following the strategy announcement.

Cryptocurrency mining facilities offer AI operators pre-built advantages: high-density power delivery, advanced cooling, and fiber connectivity. Building equivalent infrastructure costs $800-$1,200 per kilowatt new, according to JLL data center research. Reusing mining sites cuts capital expenditure 40-60%.

The transition carries execution risks in securing AI contracts and completing facility conversions. Stock performance will test investor appetite for crypto-to-AI transitions as capital shifts from mining equipment to data center infrastructure across North America's power corridor.


Sources:
1 Globe Newswire, "Infinico Metals Corp. Announces $200,000 Non-Brokered Private Placement, Changes to Board of Directo" (December 03, 2025)
2 Globe Newswire, "DMG Blockchain Solutions Announces 75 MW Utility Approval Expanding Christina Lake Data Center Power" (March 06, 2026)
3 Yahoo Finance, "Cenovus Energy’s Christina Lake Expansion Reshapes Growth And Valuation Story" (March 04, 2026)
4 Nasdaq, "Despite 311 Pages of Criticism, NASA Still Won't Cancel the Boeing Starliner" (March 14, 2026)

In this story · Knowledge Files

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Hawkish Fed Signals at Jackson Hole Pressure Rate-Sensitive Assets
Kevin Warsh's hawkish inflation remarks at Jackson Hole, alongside a steady drumbeat of Federal Reserve testimony from Powell, Barr, Bowman and other officials on supervision, regulation and monetary policy, signal continued vigilance against inflation rather than an imminent easing cycle. Rate-sensitive and precious-metals-linked names such as SSR Mining sold off the same day, consistent with markets repricing for a firmer-for-longer policy stance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,979
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,979 facts checked against source5,261 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com