Monday, November 2, 2026

Data Processing Units Offload Security Tasks as Global AI Infrastructure Race Intensifies

NVIDIA's BlueField-3 chips now run FortiGate firewall software directly on silicon, enforcing zero-trust policies without taxing GPU compute resources. The architecture shift—moving security, networking, and storage to dedicated processors—mirrors data center design patterns emerging across hyperscale operators in North America, Europe, and Asia as enterprises convert legacy infrastructure to handle AI workloads.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

March 17, 2026

Source Trace Score6 source documents6 with a live linkVerifiability: Strong
Data Processing Units Offload Security Tasks as Global AI Infrastructure Race Intensifies
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.

NVIDIA's BlueField-3 data processing units now execute FortiGate firewall software directly on the chip, enforcing zero-trust network policies at line rate while GPUs remain dedicated to AI computation.1 The integration eliminates a bottleneck that has constrained global data center operators: traditional security architectures tax the same processors needed for AI training and inference.

Kevin Deierling, networking executive at NVIDIA, said AI factories require a new class of secure, accelerated infrastructure.2 The design separates infrastructure services from computation by handling networking, storage, and security on dedicated silicon rather than sharing general-purpose CPUs—a shift already underway at hyperscale operators from North America to Asia.

Data center operators worldwide are converting existing facilities to support AI workloads. Milton Ault III projected 2026 as pivotal for hyperscale operations, citing organic expansion in AI infrastructure and the return of Ballista, a restructured data center asset.3 Years of capital investment in infrastructure and software platforms are now positioned to generate scaled revenue as enterprises across regions deploy AI systems.

The hardware approach addresses constraints affecting global operators: AI workloads demand massive parallel processing, but legacy security and networking architectures consume compute resources needed for model execution. Moving these functions to DPUs lets operators run security policies at full network speed while GPUs focus entirely on AI tasks.

Enterprise software vendors building AI features depend on this infrastructure shift. Adobe and UiPath have integrated AI agents into their platforms, while products like AgentMail run autonomous systems requiring consistent, low-latency compute. These applications assume infrastructure can handle both heavy AI workloads and strict security requirements simultaneously—a challenge facing operators in every major market.

The architectural evolution mirrors earlier data center transitions, when storage and networking moved from software on servers to dedicated controllers. DPUs represent the next iteration: chips purpose-built to handle everything except application workloads, creating isolated security boundaries without performance overhead.

Source documents

Via News is a conduit. We point to the source documents behind this report — we don't replace them. Trace any claim to its source and decide what to trust. How we source

Source Trace Score6 source documents6 with a live linkVerifiability: Strong
  1. [1]News articleYahoo Finance· March 14, 2026
    Crypto Currents: SEC, CFTC sign MOU for Joint Harmonization Initiative
  2. [2]News articleYahoo Finance· December 16, 2025
    Fortinet Delivers Isolated Infrastructure Acceleration for the AI Factory with NVIDIA
  3. [3]News articleCrunchbase News
    5 Interesting Startup Deals You May Have Missed: Blood-Drawing Robots, Inboxes For AI Agents, Franchised Defense Manufacturing, And More
  4. [4]News articleSeeking Alpha· March 8, 2026
    Earnings week ahead: ORCL, ADBE, LI, NIO, HPE, ZIM, KSS, and more
  5. [5]News articleYahoo Finance· March 11, 2026
    OppFi (OPFI) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
  6. [6]Press releaseGlobeNewswire· March 11, 2026
    The $15 Billion Signal From the Pentagon

In this story · Knowledge Files

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Agentic AI Goes Operational: Platform Governance, Local Silicon, and the Physical-AI Data Race
In mid-to-late October 2026, enterprise vendors (Cisco, Fortinet, ServiceNow, Intuit, Salesforce/Braze, Adobe) shipped agent governance, AI security and AI-driven customer engagement products, while a parallel hardware wave (NVIDIA RTX Spark laptops, ASUS, Apple's iPad mini, Microsoft's hybrid local/cloud Windows) pushed AI onto local devices. A third strand, physical AI (Encord, Harvest Praxis, Hesai), argues that real-world sensor data and cheaper edge chips are the next bottleneck. The common thread is the shift from AI experimentation to governed, scaled deployment, with Salesforce's Braze acquisition showing consolidation and fintech players like Intuit tying AI to trusted financial data. The facts support a broad industry theme but contain little direct finance or regulatory evidence, so the AI-finance angle is thin.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,533 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com