Sunday, November 1, 2026

China Courting India In Response To U.S Trade War Stand-Off

Ruchi Gupta

August 24, 2018

Docks of Jawaharlal Nehru Port (Mumbai), the largest container port in India. Photo by: Robert Cutts.
NEW DELHI (India) - Concerned by escalating trade war standoff with the U.S, China is eyeing close relationship with India as it continues to explore new ways of offsetting any losses that may come into being. The country has come under immense pressure in recent months on the Trump administration imposing import tariffs as it seeks to offset the $375 billion trade tariffs.

China India Push

China is aggressively looking for new trading partners as an insurance policy in case its trade standoff with the U.S gets out of hand. India has since emerged as a worthy partner given that it boasts one of the largest economies in the world growing at an impressive rate. [caption id="attachment_5079" align="aligncenter" width="696"]Docks of Jawaharlal Nehru Port (Mumbai), the largest container port in India. Photo by: Robert Cutts. Docks of Jawaharlal Nehru Port (Mumbai), the largest container port in India. Photo by: Robert Cutts.[/caption] “It essentially has an insurance policy". China is probably thinking that, “we don’t know how things will pan out with the U.S., but in the meantime, China should see what’s best for ourselves,” said Song Seng Won, an economist with the CIMB in Singapore.

Trade Deficit

However, a trade relationship with India won’t be a walk in the park. Narendra Modi administration has already raised its fair share of concerns about the country’s own trade deficit with China. India’s trade deficit with China stood at a whopping $51 billion as of last year. The fact that China knows its trade practices with India are imbalanced all but raises the stake for it to make some changes all in the effort of building close ties. India officials, however, remain skeptical about China’s latest push given that it continues to undermine the country’s manufacturing sector by dumping cheap subsidized goods while importing raw material. China exports to India are mostly made’ up of electronics, machines, and chemicals. In return, it only imports raw materials made up of cotton copper and other precious metals. The big question now is whether China is serious about tweaking its trade practices to be able to accommodate new partners such as India as trade tension with the U.S escalates.
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
ESMO 2026 Oncology Catalyst Cluster: Ivonescimab's PDUFA Date and Small-Cap Biotech Delistings
ESMO 2026 (Oct 22-24) concentrates a wave of oncology readouts. Summit's ivonescimab (10 presentations, positive HARMONi-GI1 OS, new EA2251 Phase II/III with ECOG-ACRIN) leads, ahead of its FDA PDUFA date of 2026-11-14, and Daiichi Sankyo's DXd ADC platform (REJOICE-Ovarian, DESTINY-Lung04, TUXEDO-3) follows. At the other end of the capital-markets spectrum, micro-cap Spago Nanomedical is moving to delist from Nasdaq First North (board resolution Oct 22, EGM Nov 19, application Jan 2027). Pivotal data and regulatory milestones are rewarding well-funded late-stage players, while cash-constrained early-stage developers are exiting public markets.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,525 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com