Tuesday, September 1, 2026

This is How India and Thailand Policies Have Affected Cryptocurrencies Sentiments

Ruchi Gupta

August 21, 2018

Reserve bank of India, Headquarters. Photo by: Soham Banerjee
NEW DELHI (India) - A pronunciation by the Reverse Bank of India barring all banks and financial institutions form dealing in virtual currencies has had an adverse effect on the overall cryptocurrency landscape. The sell-off that has come to be in recent months can be attributed to such actions as centralized authorities continue to crack the whip on decentralized currencies.

India Crypto Ban

The new policy according to blockchain and cryptocurrency analyst Vikram Nikkam does not come as a surprise given that centralized financial institutions will always oppose Bitcoin (BTC) and other de-centralized currency. According to the analyst, such institutions continue to oppose the emerging currencies for fear of losing powers that control the economy. “The RBI….like all others that are pro centralized currency are going to try their best to squash all decentralized currencies. They haven't been successful so far with their press statements and commented so this directive is their new approach to tackling the 'monster' that is lurking in the shadows,” said Mr. Nikkam. The Reserve Bank of India ban has adversely affected the country’s market as people who had started to take a keen interest in the emerging spectacle have already taken a step back. The fact that financial institutions cannot facilitate cryptocurrencies transactions all but makes it impossible to pursue investment opportunities in the sector. India’s crypto market could, however, receive a boost on the government launching a national cryptocurrency. A cryptocurrency backed by fiat cash, in this case, will help underscore the benefits of virtual currencies such as quick transfer speeds which could help change the perception about such currencies.

Thailand Crack on Crypto Firms

India’s legislation is not the only one that has had an adverse effect on the larger crypto market. Thailand another emerging market for crypto assets has blocked a number of firms from servicing the needs of people in the burgeoning sector. Thai Securities and Exchange Commission has only approved seven firms to legally carry out cryptocurrency operations from an initial list of over 20 firms. Five of the firms are crypto exchanges while the other two are cryptocurrency dealers.

In this story · Knowledge Files

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge: Late-August 2026 Funding Wave Spans Fintech, Enterprise Agents, and Robotics
A dense cluster of funding rounds landing on 2026-08-28 — from identity/fraud fintech player Socure ($156M plus its acquisition of Fravity) to enterprise AI agent startups (Instinct, Generalist AI, Owner), model infrastructure (Stability AI, Emerald AI), and autonomous logistics/aerospace (Gatik, Regent Craft) — signals investors are rotating aggressively into AI-native companies with demonstrable ROI, especially in financial risk/compliance and back-office automation. Parallel signals (Multiverse Computing's compression benchmarks cutting inference cost/latency, and Arkestro/CloneOps.ai publishing hard savings and labor-displacement figures) suggest the funding is chasing efficiency and measurable economic impact rather than pure model scale.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,980
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,980 facts checked against source5,267 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com