Broadcom Inc.
Semiconductor and infrastructure software company specializing in AI accelerators, networking, and enterprise software
Every fact below is drawn from Via News's knowledge graph and linked to the source document it came from. Nothing here is unsourced. How we source →
Key metrics · each point sourced
Stated objectives
Q1 FY2026 AI semiconductor revenue target doubling YoY
sourceQ1 FY2026 adjusted EBITDA margin target
sourceFY2026 infrastructure software low double-digit growth driven by VMware
sourceFY2026 annual dividend per share target
sourceShip $73B AI backlog over next 18 months
sourceQ1 FY2026 revenue target of approximately $19.1B
sourceQ1 FY2026 adjusted EBITDA target of 67% of revenue
sourceQ1 FY2026 AI semiconductor revenue target of $8.2B, doubling year-over-year
sourceFY2026 annual dividend target of $2.60 per share
sourceQ1 FY2026 total revenue forecast
sourceRelationship graph · 882 connections
Where sources disagree
We surface conflicts between sources rather than hiding them.
Two significantly different stock prices are reported for Broadcom Inc.: $479.23 (Fact A, dated 2026-06-03) vs $401.825 (Fact B, no timestamp). The ~16% price discrepancy represents a material conflict. However, Fact B's missing observation timestamp creates ambiguity: if both refer to 2026-06-03, this is a clear contradiction; if from different dates, the difference could reflect normal market movement. The absence of timestamp data for Fact B is itself problematic and suggests potential data quality issues.
Broadcom Inc.'s stock price is reported as both 479.23 USD (observed 2026-06-03) and 349.05 USD (unspecified date). While different timestamps could justify different prices, FACT B lacks a date, making it unclear whether these represent the same or different periods. The 27% price difference is substantial. If both are current/intended-as-current values, this is a clear contradiction. If FACT B is historical (pre-June 3), it's expected variance but represents poor data organization.
Two different stock prices are reported for Broadcom Inc.: $479.23 (observed 2026-06-03) and $315.19 (no observation timestamp). The 34% price difference is far too large to be normal intraday volatility. FACT B's missing observation date prevents temporal verification, but the conflicting values represent a clear data conflict that requires source validation and reconciliation.
Two different stock prices are reported for Broadcom Inc.: 479.23 USD (observed 2026-06-03) vs 320.8437 USD (no timestamp). Without a timestamp on FACT B, it's unclear if these represent the same point in time. If they do, this is a direct value conflict. The 33% price difference is significant. If FACT B represents a different time period, the contradiction depends on whether the price swing is consistent with market movement during that period.
Both facts reference the same entity and attribute (Broadcom Inc. stock price) but report significantly different values (479.23 USD vs 347.65 USD, a ~27% difference). While stock prices legitimately fluctuate over time, Fact B's missing observation timestamp ('None') prevents temporal reconciliation. If both values purport to represent the same time period, this is a material contradiction. If Fact B is from a different date, the discrepancy could reflect normal market movement.
Two different stock price values reported for Broadcom Inc. with conflicting temporal information. Fact A shows $479.23 on 2026-06-03, while Fact B shows $341.67 with no observation date (None). Without a timestamp for Fact B, it's ambiguous whether these represent the same point in time. The 30% price difference is significant and suggests either: (1) they are from different dates (not contradictory), or (2) Fact B's missing timestamp indicates corrupted/incomplete data that conflicts with Fact A.
Fact A and Fact B represent significantly different stock prices for Broadcom (479.23 USD vs 313.23 USD, a 53% difference). Fact A is timestamped 2026-06-03, but Fact B lacks any observation date. The missing timestamp in Fact B makes it impossible to determine if this is historical data from a different period or a data quality issue. If both are intended to represent current/recent state, this is a clear contradiction. If Fact B is from an earlier date, the difference could be legitimate but should be documented.
The two facts report significantly different stock prices for Broadcom Inc.: 479.23 USD (Fact A) vs 333.94 USD (Fact B) — a difference of ~30%. Fact A is dated 2026-06-03, but Fact B has no observation timestamp (None), creating timing ambiguity. If these facts claim to represent the same point in time, they directly contradict. Even if from different dates, the lack of dating on Fact B suggests potential data quality issues.
The two facts report substantially different stock prices for Broadcom Inc.: 479.23 USD (Fact A, dated 2026-06-03) vs 347.495 USD (Fact B, no date). This represents a 27.5% difference. While both facts claim the same attribute for the same entity, the missing observation timestamp on Fact B introduces ambiguity—these could represent different market periods. However, if both are intended to represent the same or overlapping timeframe, they directly contradict each other.
The two facts report significantly different stock prices for the same entity (31% difference: $479.23 vs $364.64). While Fact A is timestamped (2026-06-03), Fact B has no timestamp, making temporal reconciliation impossible. This is a material data conflict that requires investigation into source, data quality, or whether Fact B represents a different time period.
Two significantly different stock prices recorded for Broadcom Inc. FACT A shows $479.23 on 2026-06-03, while FACT B shows $315.25 with no observation date. Without a timestamp for FACT B, it's unclear if this represents a different time period (legitimate change over time) or the same period (data conflict). The 34% price difference ($163.98) is substantial and represents either a major market move or conflicting data sources.