Monday, August 31, 2026

Leading Neuroscientist Explains Where Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience Meet, and Dangers Ahead

Anthony Zador, Chair in Neuroscience at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, warned at Web Summit about AI's potential to eliminate tens of millions of jobs while discussing how artificial intelligence should be used for good.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

November 14, 2017

Anthony Zador interview at the Web Summit.
MADRID (ViaNews) - Anthony Zador is Chair in Neuroscience and Professor of Biology at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, wherein 1953, Watson made the first public presentation of DNA's double-helix structure. Mr. Zador went to this year’s edition of the Web Summit to talk about “Using Artificial Intelligence for good”. He believes AI is "going to be eliminating tens of millions of jobs and it’s unclear what they’re going to be replaced with”.
"We're going to be eliminating tens of millions of jobs and it's unclear what they're going to be replaced with"

Anthony Zador

Anthony Zador's goal is to understand the neural circuits underlying cortical processing and he is currently developing a new high-throughput approach to determining brain wiring using next-generation DNA sequencing. We met with him at the Web Summit to know the latest news on AI and Neuroscience research. Neuroscientist Anthony Zador interview. Miguel Salvado: How are you finding the Web Summit so far? Anthony Zador: It's been a lot of fun. An amazing collection of people, it's been really interesting. How are you finding Lisbon? I love Lisbon, this isn't my first time here. I'm a neuroscientist here at one of the leading Neuroscience Institute in the world, Lisbon's Champalimaud institute. I've been to Lisbon a few times to visit there. Tell us a bit about what you do in neuroscience. My research is focused on understanding brain circuits. The brain has a hundred billion neurons, a hundred trillion connections and to understand how they are all connected. The way they are connected makes you, you, and makes me, me. We're developing a technology that will allow us to unravel the wiring diagram of a brain, quickly and cheaply with the goal of understanding how your brain works and how it stops working when you're depressed or schizophrenic. Eventually, it might help us build better machines. You're mapping, or framing, a system that you can implement technologically? That's right. It turns out that the current generation of Artificial Intelligence is based on taking insight from how real brains are wired up. The reason that neuro networks work today and didn't work 25-years ago is that we built-in more about how we know brains work, and it is those insights that have allowed for the current generation of neural networks. [caption id="attachment_2930" align="aligncenter" width="640"]Anthony Zador interview at the Web Summit. Anthony Zador interview at the Web Summit.[/caption] In a way, is AI going back to basics? That's right. They used to think that you can just ignore the brain, you could just watch behavior, we could just seat down at a computer and program machines to do what people do, but that has failed. That didn't get us any further. That worked for chess, but what made computers able to recognize images and beat the world champion in Go was neural networks. Those are networks that came from understanding how real brains are wired up, and we're just at the beginning of that. We're just taking the tiniest bit of what we know actual brains do and put them into networks. We're at the forefront of taking extra information about how real networks are wired up and putting those into machines. How do you see AI going over the next years concerning what you're doing right now? The good news for me is a lot of fun. There are tremendous opportunities for understanding how networks work and implementing them. The more troubling thing is that the consequences for society are going to be, in a lot of ways, devastating. Particularly in the United States where we don't have social services the way you do in Europe. We're going to be eliminating tens of millions of jobs and it's unclear what they're going to be replaced with, if they're going to be replaced by anything. That's real challenges, but it's a question of society, it's not the fault of technology.
LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Network, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Hawkish Fed Signals at Jackson Hole Pressure Rate-Sensitive Assets
Kevin Warsh's hawkish inflation remarks at Jackson Hole, alongside a steady drumbeat of Federal Reserve testimony from Powell, Barr, Bowman and other officials on supervision, regulation and monetary policy, signal continued vigilance against inflation rather than an imminent easing cycle. Rate-sensitive and precious-metals-linked names such as SSR Mining sold off the same day, consistent with markets repricing for a firmer-for-longer policy stance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,979
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,979 facts checked against source5,261 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com