Tuesday, September 1, 2026

USD/EUR Is 2% Up In The Last 21 Sessions

ViaNews Editorial Team

January 28, 2024

USD/EUR Is 2% Up In The Last 21 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - USD/EUR (USDEUR) has been up by 2.32% for the last 21 sessions. At 13:12 EST on Sunday, 28 January, USD/EUR (USDEUR) is $0.92.

USD/EUR's yearly highs and lows, it's 3.856% up from its 52-week low and 3.751% down from its 52-week high.

News about

  • According to FXStreet on Friday, 26 January, "Any further decline is more likely to attract some buyers near the 147.00 round figure, which should help limit the downside for the USD/JPY pair near the 146.45 area, or the weekly trough touched on Wednesday. ", "Given that oscillators on the daily chart are holding comfortably in the positive territory, the USD/JPY pair might then aim to surpass an intermediate hurdle near the 149.30-149.35 zone and reclaim the 150.00 psychological mark."
  • Usd/jpy forecast: US dollar continues to consolidate against Japanese yen - 26 January 2024. According to DailyForex on Friday, 26 January, "In general, this is a scenario where there should be plenty of value hunters out there, but even if you are not willing to trade this pair, you could use the USD/JPY pair as a bit of a barometer for Japanese Yen strength or weakness, and trade other yen related pairs based on what you see in this one. ", "For example, the AUD/JPY pair might be what you are looking to trade, but if you see the USD/JPY pair rising, you have yet another indication that the Japanese yen is going to weaken. "
  • Usd/jpy price analysis: hovers around 147.70 with the bullish sentiment. According to FXStreet on Friday, 26 January, "The technical analysis of the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for the USD/JPY pair suggests a confirmation of a prevailing bullish sentiment in the market with the MACD line positioning above the centreline and showing a divergence above the signal line.", "A collapsebelow the psychological support level could push the USD/JPY pair to test support zone around the 14-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at 146.90 and 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level at 146.78."

More news about USD/EUR (USDEUR).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge: Late-August 2026 Funding Wave Spans Fintech, Enterprise Agents, and Robotics
A dense cluster of funding rounds landing on 2026-08-28 — from identity/fraud fintech player Socure ($156M plus its acquisition of Fravity) to enterprise AI agent startups (Instinct, Generalist AI, Owner), model infrastructure (Stability AI, Emerald AI), and autonomous logistics/aerospace (Gatik, Regent Craft) — signals investors are rotating aggressively into AI-native companies with demonstrable ROI, especially in financial risk/compliance and back-office automation. Parallel signals (Multiverse Computing's compression benchmarks cutting inference cost/latency, and Arkestro/CloneOps.ai publishing hard savings and labor-displacement figures) suggest the funding is chasing efficiency and measurable economic impact rather than pure model scale.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,980
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,980 facts checked against source5,267 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com