Sunday, September 13, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleSeeking Alpha· March 27, 2026

Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1%

View original at seekingalpha.com
Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1% [Philadelphia] Hardikkumar Joshi Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Anna Paulson sees the long-run federal funds rate closer to the SEP median of 3.1%…
Opening lines of the source · Seeking Alpha · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • When talking to businesses, there is genuine enthusiasm about AI but also cautious implementation, with big productivity effects likely to mostly lie ahead

    60% confidence
  • Inflation has been above the 2% target for six years, and while significant progress has been made, inflation is still 2.8%, not 2%

    60% confidence
  • The labor market is relevant for evaluating a surge in growth; if unemployment is high, there is more room to be patient, but near full employment makes the calculus trickier

    60% confidence
  • The bar for interest rate hikes is quite high as growth slows

    60% confidence
  • Under a medium-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be higher at around 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • In January, she still felt cautiously optimistic on inflation after the latest data and reiterated her view for additional interest-rate cuts later in 2026

    60% confidence
  • The conflict in the Middle East has created new risks to both inflation and growth

    60% confidence
  • The long-run federal funds rate is closer to the SEP median of 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • Iran conflict complicates demand, labor, and inflation outlook

    60% confidence
  • When productivity growth is higher, there are more investment opportunities and stronger demand for capital, putting upward pressure on interest rates

    60% confidence
  • The economic position today is different from January

    60% confidence
  • Under a high-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be at the upper end of the SEP's central tendency at 3.5%

    60% confidence
  • Long-term inflation expectations are consistent with 2%, but they may also be a little more fragile

    60% confidence
  • Trends in labor market momentum and wage growth can provide valuable signals about the extent to which a surge in growth is creating inflationary pressures

    60% confidence
  • Under a low-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be relatively low at around 2.5%, similar to pre-pandemic levels

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Keeps Flowing as Enterprise Adoption and Government Contracts Validate the Bet
A late-August surge of nine-figure funding rounds (Socure, Stability AI, Generalist AI, Gatik, Regent Craft, Emerald AI, Owner) shows venture capital still pouring into AI infrastructure, identity/fintech, and autonomy, even as public-market sentiment stays jumpy — Palantir's stock fell 6% the same week it landed the Army's TITAN contract. UiPath's raised guidance and strong Q2 results, alongside efficiency breakthroughs like Multiverse Computing's model compression, point to real enterprise monetization catching up to the funding hype.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Both facts record the same attribute (net_income) for JPMorgan Chase & Co. in the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31), but report values that differ by approximately 1 billion times: $16,494,000,000 vs $16.49. These cannot both be true simultaneously. The discrepancy suggests either a unit mismatch (e.g., one is total net income, the other earnings per share mislabeled as net_income), a decimal point error, or data entry corruption. For the same entity, attribute, and time period, only one value can be correct.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,280 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com