Saturday, October 3, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleSeeking Alpha· March 27, 2026

Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1%

View original at seekingalpha.com
Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1% [Philadelphia] Hardikkumar Joshi Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Anna Paulson sees the long-run federal funds rate closer to the SEP median of 3.1%…
Opening lines of the source · Seeking Alpha · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • When talking to businesses, there is genuine enthusiasm about AI but also cautious implementation, with big productivity effects likely to mostly lie ahead

    60% confidence
  • Inflation has been above the 2% target for six years, and while significant progress has been made, inflation is still 2.8%, not 2%

    60% confidence
  • The labor market is relevant for evaluating a surge in growth; if unemployment is high, there is more room to be patient, but near full employment makes the calculus trickier

    60% confidence
  • The bar for interest rate hikes is quite high as growth slows

    60% confidence
  • Under a medium-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be higher at around 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • In January, she still felt cautiously optimistic on inflation after the latest data and reiterated her view for additional interest-rate cuts later in 2026

    60% confidence
  • The conflict in the Middle East has created new risks to both inflation and growth

    60% confidence
  • The long-run federal funds rate is closer to the SEP median of 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • Iran conflict complicates demand, labor, and inflation outlook

    60% confidence
  • When productivity growth is higher, there are more investment opportunities and stronger demand for capital, putting upward pressure on interest rates

    60% confidence
  • The economic position today is different from January

    60% confidence
  • Under a high-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be at the upper end of the SEP's central tendency at 3.5%

    60% confidence
  • Long-term inflation expectations are consistent with 2%, but they may also be a little more fragile

    60% confidence
  • Trends in labor market momentum and wage growth can provide valuable signals about the extent to which a surge in growth is creating inflationary pressures

    60% confidence
  • Under a low-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be relatively low at around 2.5%, similar to pre-pandemic levels

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Pharma Pipeline Catalysts and M&A Heat Up as AI-Designed Drugs Enter the Clinic
Late-September 2026 brought a dense run of clinical readouts: Novo Nordisk's CagriSema data at EASD, Lilly's ADtouch results for EBGLYSS, and Merck's tulisokibart Phase 2b result. Lilly's $2.9B Merida Biosciences acquisition and the 2026-11-14 FDA PDUFA date for ivonescimab sit alongside these as the main deal and regulatory events. AI-designed drugs such as rentosertib, and speculative AI-linked trial ventures such as QAIAx, are moving from hype toward clinical validation. Broader AI-sector regulatory and legal friction (Tesla Cybercab probe, xAI Minnesota ruling, OpenAI lawsuits) shows rising scrutiny that could spill into AI-driven healthcare.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Apple Inc.
The observation date (2025-12-27) precedes Q1 2026, making it logically impossible to have actual Q1 2026 cash data at that point. Q1 2026 would not end until March 31, 2026. Additionally, the magnitude of the difference ($45.3B vs $132.42) is implausibly large even as a normal quarterly change for Apple. While different fiscal periods can show different values, the timing relationship here suggests a data integrity issue rather than legitimate period-over-period variation.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,985
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,985 facts checked against source5,329 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com