Sunday, August 30, 2026

Investing In Artificial Intelligence: What Tech Giants and Venture Capitalists Look at

Ruchi Gupta

August 14, 2019

9 July 2018; Speakers, from left, Anson Bailey, KPMG, Kevin Jacques, Visa, Michael Xue, Lenovo Capital & Incubator Group, Nina Zhou, Swiss Re, and Donald Lacey, Ping An Insurance, take a selfie during Venture prior to the start of RISE 2018 at HKEx in Hong Kong. Photo by Stephen McCarthy / RISE via Sportsfile

Artificial Intelligence Market Size

Artificial Intelligence is billed as the next big thing for a good reason. The revolutionary technology is already having an impact on how companies operate, going as far as affecting people’s way of life. AI-powered tech is slowly gaining prominence from the auto industry to powering operations in tech giants as well as enhancing data security. Increased use has everything to do with increased investments in the sector as companies look to gain a head start on its benefits.

Data by PricewaterhouseCoopers indicates that the size of the AI market is poised to hit $15.7 trillion by 2030. An upsurge in investments by tech giants looking to come up with the next big thing leveraging the revolutionary technology has everything to do with the growth of the market size.

For instance, Softbank is fresh from setting up a $108 billion fund targeting emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence. Microsoft just like other tech companies has also taken a keen interest in the technology. Having already made several investments in the past, the company has in the recent past, bought equity stake worth $1 billion in OpenAI, a company focused on AI innovations.

Given the sums of money that companies are investing, artificial intelligence looks set to be a key driver of innovation in the future. Right from enhancing cybersecurity to enhancing the autonomous car technology, AI is slowly becoming a force to reckon with. 

Amidst millions of dollars in investment, it is important to understand what venture capitalists, as well as tech companies, look at, before investing AI startups as well as innovations.

9 July 2018; Speakers, from left, Anson Bailey, KPMG, Kevin Jacques, Visa, Michael Xue, Lenovo Capital & Incubator Group, Nina Zhou, Swiss Re, and Donald Lacey, Ping An Insurance, take a selfie during Venture prior to the start of RISE 2018 at HKEx in Hong Kong. Photo by Stephen McCarthy / RISE via Sportsfile
Speakers, from left, Anson Bailey, KPMG, Kevin Jacques, Visa, Michael Xue, Lenovo Capital & Incubator Group, Nina Zhou, Swiss Re, and Donald Lacey, Ping An Insurance, take a selfie during Venture prior to the start of RISE, the largest tech conference in Asia. Photo by Stephen McCarthy / RISE via Sportsfile

Proprietary Data

Any startup with proprietary rock-solid data that can allow the training of models is always sure to attract investments form tech giants. Proprietary data that the likes of Google or Amazon cannot gain access to is always sure to attract interest, as artificial intelligence is all about big data.

Gaining access to proprietary data can be a challenge. However, there are a variety of hacks that some AI-focused startups are using with success. For starters, some firms have incentivized their customers, thus allowing them to share data in return for a discount. Partnerships with institutions with access to proprietary data have also allowed some AI startups to gain access to crucial data for training models.

While access to data is important, there also ought to be a backroom team able to clean, structure, and make good use of the data at hand.

Underlying Team

Artificial intelligence startups are as good as the driving force behind them. Depending on the field of specialization, AI startups always come with different teams. For startups focused on e-commerce, then it would be wise to go with startups backed by people with experience in commerce as well as consultants. For Internet of Things then hardware and software, engineers are necessary for the success of a startup.

Besides, the success of an AI startup would most of the time come down to founders. The more science-focused founders backing a startup the more is its likelihood of succeeding. This is one of the factors taken into consideration when carrying out due diligence.

Market

The market is an important aspect of any product under development. While there is potential for artificial intelligence right from traffic flow to logistics as well as robotics, an AI startup must clearly stipulate its target market.

Startups that have well-defined target market are always sure to attract strong interest from investment firms as well as Venture Capitalists. Startups worth investing, in this case, are those whose AI products can go after very possible customer, right from enterprises to governments as well as developers.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Enterprise AI's Trust Gap: Microsoft-Mistral Ecosystem Expansion Meets a Governance Deficit in Agentic Adoption
Microsoft is deepening its AI platform bet through simultaneous moves — expanding its Mistral partnership (Copilot Studio, Foundry, European infrastructure capacity) and deepening enterprise AI governance ties with Manulife — just as independent research (Google Cloud, VentureBeat, Box) shows enterprises racing toward agentic AI adoption (100% planned within two years) while data access and trust in agent decisions lag badly (average 45% data access, only ~half trust agent outputs). The result is a structural mismatch between platform-vendor momentum and enterprise readiness to actually govern and trust the agents being deployed.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Same entity (Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC), same metric (net_income), same fiscal period (Q1 2026), same observation date (2026-03-31), but vastly different values: $5.567 billion vs. $5.57. These cannot coexist for the same time period. Fact B appears to be a data entry error (possible missing decimal placement: 5.57 should likely be 5,567,000,000 or a per-share figure incorrectly entered as total).
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,979
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,979 facts checked against source5,257 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com