Monday, August 31, 2026

Half of Employees Believe Office Spaces Are Not Safe

ViaNews Editorial Team

October 14, 2020

Photo by You X Ventures on Unsplash

Only 50% of employees believe office spaces are safe and even fewer trust their CEOs and senior managers to ensure their workers are protected from getting or spreading the virus, according to a recent survey.

“In most countries, only a quarter or more will go back to the office before Christmas,” public relations firm Edelman wrote in a report published in September.

The company surveyed 3,400 workers in seven countries—France, Germany, India, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the U.S.—in August.

It found that there is no consensus among employees about who has to make the ultimate decision about when workers should return to the workplace.

Health authorities, state and local government, national government, and workers themselves each earned about the same share of employee confidence—around 20 percent, the report said.

Read more: 10 Decisive Business Actions to Emerge Stronger From COVID-19

Another key finding is that only 14 percent of employees trust CEOs and senior managers to safely lead them back to work.

In the meantime, workers reported strong confidence in their ability to work from home.

“Three-quarters trust their employers when they say that working remotely will not harm their career. More than two-thirds say that companies have communicated effectively on return to workplace,” the company noted.

Steps to Take

Edelman says businesses should implement the following measures to build and sustain employee confidence over a gradual return to the office:

1- Establish a partnership with local governments and health authorities to ease employees’ concerns through measures such as organizing safer commuting options and instituting flexible start and end times.

2- Disseminate high-quality, reliable information from expert sources to fill the information void consistently.

3- Follow the guidelines set out by health officials and keep reminding employees of the importance of their responsibility, including wearing a mask and maintaining the recommended social distance.

4- Insist on contact tracing and testing, even if asymptomatic people..

5- Be as transparent as possible when an employee gets sick.

Read more: Cybersecurity Effects of Coronavirus in ASEAN and the Path Ahead

6- As the economy recovers, restore salaries that were cut, pay bonuses for those that showed a solid performance despite the pandemic and promote those who deserve it.

7- Create a new position of Chief Public Health Officer, as proposed by Michelle Williams, dean of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, as it can help solve public health challenges that intersect with business priorities such as vaccine adoption, the wellness of the workforce, and social justice.  

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Hawkish Fed Signals at Jackson Hole Pressure Rate-Sensitive Assets
Kevin Warsh's hawkish inflation remarks at Jackson Hole, alongside a steady drumbeat of Federal Reserve testimony from Powell, Barr, Bowman and other officials on supervision, regulation and monetary policy, signal continued vigilance against inflation rather than an imminent easing cycle. Rate-sensitive and precious-metals-linked names such as SSR Mining sold off the same day, consistent with markets repricing for a firmer-for-longer policy stance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,979
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,979 facts checked against source5,261 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com