Thursday, September 24, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleYahoo Finance· February 2, 2026

Aptiv (APTV) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Aptiv (APTV) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Image source: The Motley Fool. Date Monday, Feb. 2, 2026 at 8 a.m. ET Call participants Chairman and Chief Executive Officer — Kevin Clark Chief Financial Officer — Varun Laroyia Designated CEO, Versagen — Joe Liatine Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst?…
Opening lines of the source · Yahoo Finance · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • Total bookings for 2026 expected to exceed $30B for combined Aptiv and Versagen

    80% confidence
  • Historical DRAM cost recovery has been approximately 100% pass-through to customers

    80% confidence
  • Software and services business represents approximately 25% of NuAptiv business with mid-teens growth rate

    80% confidence
  • Aptiv is highly confident it will be able to push DRAM cost increases through to OEM customers

    80% confidence
  • Versagen has momentum heading into 2026 and is confident in ability to deliver shareholder value as independent company

    80% confidence
  • Non-automotive revenue grew 8% full-year 2025, with other industrial growing faster than commercial vehicles in Q4

    80% confidence
  • 2026 vehicle production forecast revised to down 1% from prior expectation of up 1%, with Q1 down 4%

    80% confidence
  • 2026 is a very exciting year for both Aptiv and for Versagen as we unlock value through the formation of two independent, optimally positioned public companies

    80% confidence
  • China weakness expected in Q1 2026 with strengthening expected Q3-Q4

    80% confidence
  • The four to seven points growth target through 2028 remains intact

    80% confidence
  • Our resilient operating model enables us to execute flawlessly in this dynamic environment

    80% confidence
  • DRAM price increases expected to be low double-digits in 2026, with 2027 expected to be less than 100-120% increases

    80% confidence
  • Supply chain visibility achieved at 95% to Tier 3 and 99% for semiconductors to Tier 5

    80% confidence
  • Copper budgeted at $5.50/lb for 2026 versus $4.51 actual in 2025, representing approximately $200M top-line revenue impact for Versagen

    80% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Enterprise AI Agents Go Mainstream, But Trustworthy Data Access Lags Adoption
A wave of enterprise AI agent activity — fresh funding (Latitude's $35M Series A), a run of CB Insights CEO interviews spotlighting fintech- and healthcare-focused agent startups (Covecta, Penguin AI, Maisa AI), and major platform partnerships (Microsoft-Mistral, Manulife-Microsoft AI governance, Siemens-NVIDIA agentic EDA, Box's agent security controls) — signals agentic AI moving from pilot to production across financial and enterprise workflows. Yet Google Cloud's own research shows adoption is outrunning data readiness (companies average AI access to only 45% of their data, with 'data laggards' capped near 30%), while insider selling at incumbent C3.ai hints at mixed investor conviction even as the broader ecosystem accelerates.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,983
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,305 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com