Co-founder of Landing jobs on Shifting Job Dynamics in 2020!

December 8, 2023

Pedro Oliveira, Co-founder of Landing Jobs sheds light on how there's less confidence hiring because of the pandemic, downside in supply side, more active talent, passive talent becoming more passive, biggest changes, salary negotiations, change in policies, remote working, future of work, empathic communications, distribution, coping up and surving and more

https://youtu.be/XBVBU155fhI?si=SPsa2f3iByREwU6y

Tags

Video Interview Future of Work Jobs Remote working Future Founders Talent Recruitment Remote Work Supply Chain Unemployment Job Displacement

Via News Video

Video content and multimedia coverage from Via News, bringing you visual insights into markets, business, and finance.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page

Live from the substrate

What we're seeing

Frontier AI Slowdown Call Splits Industry, Rattles Capex-Sensitive Markets

Anthropic's Dario Amodei publicly called for a coordinated global slowdown in frontier AI development, a stance Microsoft echoed with a 'humanist' AI code of conduct, but Nvidia and Meta's CEOs rejected any coordinated pause days later, exposing a widening rift between safety-focused and growth-focused AI leaders. The dispute landed amid growing financial scrutiny of AI infrastructure spending — a hyperscaler capex analysis, FTC warnings against antitrust waivers for AI firms, and an 8.6% single-day stock drop in GE Vernova tied directly to the slowdown remarks — signaling investors are newly nervous about whether the AI capex boom (including Alphabet's projected $701B revenue narrative) can be justified if the pace of development itself becomes contested.

Our read on the data ›

Signals we're tracking

Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration

Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases

Patterns we're watching ›

Where sources disagree

ING Group

Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.

We flag conflicts openly ›

Recently verified

✓ Checked against the original source

4,983

facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.

101 entities tracked4,983 facts checked against source5,304 source documents archived

Query this data → isubstrate.com

Categories

Tags