Monday, October 12, 2026

How We Source Explore Search

Via News Knowledge File

Snowflake Inc.

organization80% conf.·synced Aug 13, 2026

Cloud-based data warehousing company

52

sourced metrics

302

relationships

20

stated objectives

8

Via News reports

Every fact below is drawn from Via News's knowledge graph and linked to the source document it came from. Nothing here is unsourced. How we source →

Key metrics · each point sourced

Earnings Growth Forecast

33.9percent

Customers Over 1m Annual Spend

733customers

Customers Over 10m Yoy Growth

56percent

Customer Growth

40percent

Backlog

9.21USD

Analyst Target Price

239USD

Customers Over 10m Annual Spend

56customers

Customers Over 1m Yoy Growth

27percent

Net New Customers

740customers

Implied Upside

55percent

Gross Margin Target

75percent

Gaap Operating Loss

-318.2USD

Forward Pe Ratio

84.3ratio

Fcf Headwind From Observe

150basis_points

Fair Value Narrative

78.83USD

Fair Value Dcf

236.22USD

Enterprise Value

50USD

Stock Price

244.82USD

Jun 2, 2026source

Stated objectives

FY2025 revenue guidance

target: 4.44B USD by 2025-01-01 00:00:00stated

Q4 product revenue guidance of $1.19B-$1.2B

target: 1.195 billion USD stated

FY revenue guidance of $4.44B

target: 4.44 billion USD stated

Q4 product revenue guidance

target: $1.19B-$1.2B stated

FY revenue guidance

target: $4.44B stated

Achieve full-year revenue of $4.44 billion

target: 4.44 billion by 2025-01-01 00:00:00stated

Q4 product revenue target

target: $1.19B to $1.2B stated

Full-year revenue target

target: $4.44B by 2025-01-01 00:00:00stated

Q4 product revenue guidance

target: 1.19-1.2 billion USD stated

Full-year revenue guidance

target: 4.44 billion USD stated

Relationship graph · 302 connections

Developed by

68

Customer of

46

Employs

28

Competes with

28

Covered by

22

Built on

16

Partners with

12

headquartered in

8

Via News coverage

Manulife, Box and Snowflake Push AI Agents Into Global Operations as Oversight Lags

August 13, 2026

Microsoft, Snowflake Expand AI Agent Platforms as Governance Rules Lag

88% of Enterprise AI Leaders Globally Regret Skipping Foundational Work as Agentic Scale Arrives

88% of Global Executives Regret Weak AI Foundations as Agentic Infrastructure Goes Live

Snowflake, EXL, and Netskope Ship Agent Infrastructure as Global Enterprise Tech Stacks Face Replacement

Global Enterprises Replace AI Assistants With Autonomous Agents, Forcing Deep Operational Restructuring

Global Enterprises Integrate AI Agents as Autonomous Workforce Members

From Co-Pilots to Autonomous Agents: Snowflake, NVIDIA, and Dell Build the Global AI Infrastructure Layer

This Knowledge File is assembled from Via News's source-traceable knowledge graph. Metrics, objectives and relationships are extracted from primary and credible secondary documents and refreshed on a schedule. Read our methodology →

What we know · the intelligence behind this page

Live from the substrate

What we're seeing

Agentic AI Rewires Enterprise Software: Platform Incumbents, Governance, and a Funded Startup Wave

Enterprise software is being rebuilt around autonomous AI agents. Incumbents and large platforms (SAP with its Autonomous Suite and Joule, Zeta with AthenaOS/AIM/Athena MCP, Meta with its new Enterprise Platform) are racing to own the agent layer. Meanwhile, seed and Series A money flows to finance-office and vertical startups (Dextr, Latitude, Dentira, Light), and consolidation continues through acquisitions (Tiny–Oso Cloud, Harvey–Guardrails AI). Investor commentary stresses that AI is better at disrupting around the edges of systems of record than at replacing them, that it should not be trusted with finance calculations, and that governance must be enforced by the system rather than left to agents.

Our read on the data ›

Signals we're tracking

EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade

High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.

Patterns we're watching ›

Where sources disagree

ING Group

Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.

We flag conflicts openly ›

Recently verified

✓ Checked against the original source

4,986

facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.

101 entities tracked4,986 facts checked against source5,371 source documents archived

Query this data → isubstrate.com